ÀÏ˾»úÎçÒ¹¸£Àû

View the related checklists about Statement

Ireland—Contract variation—checklist

Ireland—Contract variation—checklist This Checklist sets out the issues to consider when drafting a variation document to vary an underlying agreement. For a ‘how to’ guide on varying commercial contracts which signposts relevant content, see Practice Note: Ireland—How to vary a contract. Parties may consider contract variation for a number of reasons. For template variation documents, see Precedents: • Ireland—Variation agreement • Ireland—Deed of variation Variations can be drafted in letter form and this may be sufficient where the amendments are minor. Duplicate copies of the letter should always be provided and it is important to ensure that it is signed and returned before the variation is due to take effect. See Precedent: Ireland—Letter of variation. If the variation is solely to extend the term of the original contract, see Precedent: Ireland—Letter of extension. This Checklist is intended for use when varying a business-to-business agreement. Issues to consider The table below sets out the issues to consider when varying an agreement, including preliminary considerations, the difference between using a simple contract...

EU Solvency II—timeline

EU Solvency II—timeline This timeline shows key developments relating to the EU’s Solvency II framework (Directive 2009/138/EC). For earlier developments, see: Solvency II—timeline (2007–2023) [Archived]. 2025 Date Source Document Description 6 June 2025 European Commission Third-country insurers: renewal of the Brazil, Japan and Mexico provisional equivalence decision (Solvency II) The European Commission has launched a consultation on a draft delegated decision concerning the provisional equivalence for third-country insurers within groups headquartered in the EU, in accordance with Article 227 of Directive 2009/138/EC (Solvency II Directive). The Commission proposes that such groups may calculate their solvency requirements and eligible own funds using the capital requirements and available capital rules of their non-EU jurisdiction, rather than solely pursuant to Solvency II. Responses are sought by 3 July 2025, with the intention that the feedback will be considered in finalising the draft decision ahead of its planned adoption in Q3 2025.See: LNB News 06/06/2025 56. 7 May 2025 OJ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/863 of 8 May 2025 laying down technical information...

View the related flowcharts about Statement

FIDIC Contracts 2017 (Red and Yellow Books) Disputes (clause 21)—Flowchart

FIDIC Contracts 2017 (Red and Yellow Books) Disputes (clause 21)—Flowchart This flowchart sets out the process for resolving disputes under clause 21 of the FIDIC Red and Yellow Books 2017. Under the FIDIC Red and Yellow Books 2017 a Dispute arises where: • one Party has made a Claim, or there has been a matter to be agreed or determined under clause 3.5 [Agreement of Determination]; the Engineer’s determination of that claim or a Party’s assertions was a rejection or deemed rejection in whole or in part; and a Notice of Dissatisfaction (NOD) has been given by either Party under Sub-Clause 3.7.5 [Dissatisfaction with Engineer’s determination] (clause 1.1.29) • the Engineer fails to issue the relevant Payment Certificate within 56 days after receiving a Statement

View the related practice notes about Statement

CPR changes—April 2014 [Archived]

CPR changes—April 2014 [Archived] ARCHIVED: This archived Practice Note is not maintained and is for background information purposes only. Further, some of the links may not direct you to the provisions as at the date the guidance in this Practice Note was published. For further information on previous and/or subsequent amendments to the CPR, see: CPR updates—overview and Procedure Rule Committee minutes—overview. THIS PRACTICE NOTE HAS BEEN UPDATED IN LINE WITH SI 2014/867, PUBLISHED ON 2 APRIL 2014. April 2014 sees a number of changes to the CPR rules and practice directions over a number of different dates. Here, we set out a quick summary followed, for convenience, by the CPR changes in table format so the date on which changes occur are clear. The changes are made under SI 2014/407 unless stated otherwise. The SIs coming into force There are currently four SIs which are bringing changes to the CPR into force. It is anticipated that there will be a further one to deal with the new 28...

Minutes of the CPR Committee meeting of 12 October 2018 [Archived]

Minutes of the CPR Committee meeting of 12 October 2018 [Archived] ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained. This Practice Note contains the minutes of the CPR Committee (CPRC) meeting of 12 October 2018. At the meeting the committee’s discussions include the Admiralty Court’s new procedures for limitation claims, the future of the Online Civil Money Claims project, the Video Hearings pilot scheme trial duration, Part 21 amendments, the consultation responses to Part 39 (Open Justice), the effect of a ‘no deal’ Brexit on the CPR and other matters. Minutes The approved minutes of the CPRC meeting which took place on 12 October 2018 are available here: Minutes of July meeting and matters arising The Minutes of the meeting on 13 July 2018 were agreed subject to a few points: • a subcommittee to deal with matters arising from the case of McDonald v D & F Contracts has been set up • the paper on costs will...

View the related precedents about Statement

Enforcement of an award pursuant to AA 1996, s 66—sample arbitration claim form

Enforcement of an award pursuant to AA 1996, s 66—sample arbitration claim form The N8 Claim Form (arbitration) is required for an application for permission to enforce an arbitral award in the same manner as a judgment or order (and also for judgment to be entered in terms of the award) pursuant to section 66 of the Arbitration Act 1996—see Precedents: Enforcement of an award pursuant to AA 1996, s 66—example witness statement and Enforcement of an award pursuant to AA 1996, s 66—draft

Director’s questionnaire—secondary offers

Director’s questionnaire—secondary offers Private and confidential [Insert company name] (Company) Introduction Director's questionnaire For completion by [insert date] This questionnaire has been prepared in connection with the proposed [placing OR open offer OR rights issue] of [insert amount] ordinary shares of [insert nominal value] pence each in the capital of the Company (Ordinary Shares) and the proposed application for admission of the Ordinary shares to [listing on the Official List of the Financial Conduct Authority and to trading on the market for listed securities operated by London Stock Exchange plc OR trading on AIM] (Admission). This is an important document and you should answer all questions truthfully and without omissions. Please answer all questions fully and if insufficient space is provided please provide additional information on a separate sheet of paper duly signed, dated and attached to this questionnaire. If a question is answerable in the negative, please answer 'No'. Do not leave any section blank. In this questionnaire, the term 'company' includes any...

View the related q&as about Statement

Is there a prescribed form for statements of truth for an expert's report in a coroner's inquest?

Is there a prescribed form for statements of truth for an expert's report in a coroner's inquest? The calling of witnesses, including expert witnesses, in an inquest is within the coroner’s discretion. The power to require evidence to be given in writing or in person is contained in Schedule 5 to the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. For further information see Practice Note: Powers of the coroner. The duty on the coroner is to call sufficient witnesses to make sure that a proper enquiry is undertaken in order to determine cause of death. A coroner's discretion whether to call expert evidence is wide (see Mack (r on the application of) v HM Coroner for Birmingham and Solihull (2011) and the Chief Coroner's Law Sheet No 5). While independent expert evidence is not always required, it can be necessary in order to conduct such an enquiry. If expert evidence is thought necessary then a report will need to be prepared, and the coroner will often organise their own expert evidence,...

If a party represents that it does not intend to be bound by a contract and this statement is affirmed by the innocent party, if the guilty party re-states that intention, can the innocent party elect to treat the further statement as a repudiatory breach and terminate the contract?

If a party represents that it does not intend to be bound by a contract and this statement is affirmed by the innocent party, if the guilty party re-states that intention, can the innocent party elect to treat the further statement as a repudiatory breach and terminate the contract? A repudiatory breach is a breach of contract that gives the innocent party the right to treat the contract as being disregarded and entitling the innocent party to refuse to be bound by its terms. Not all contract breaches are repudiatory. A repudiatory breach goes to the core of the contract and must substantially deprive the innocent party of the absolute benefit that the contract was intended to provide. What amounts to a repudiatory breach will vary with each contract and depends on the construction of the contract and the circumstances of the case. Anticipatory breach may constitute repudiatory breach. The test for whether an anticipatory breach is also repudiatory is the same as for an actual...

View the related News about Statement

Takeover Panel proposes reforms to address dual class share structures, IPO disclosures and share buybacks

Corporate analysis: The Takeover Panel (Panel) has published a consultation paper, PCP 2025/1, proposing amendments to the Takeover Code (Code) to address the regulatory treatment of dual class share structures (DCSS), clarify disclosure obligations at IPO, and simplify the rules governing share buybacks. The proposals aim to modernise the Code in light of recent market developments, particularly the FCA’s introduction of the UK Listing Rules, and to ensure that the Code continues to provide fair and effective protection to shareholders.

DESNZ publishes onshore wind strategy

The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) has published its onshore wind strategy, detailing how the UK government plans to scale up the deployment of onshore wind to support its 2030 clean power targets. The strategy sets out 42 government commitments aimed at removing barriers to onshore wind deployment and serves as the primary output from the Onshore Wind Taskforce, which was established in July 2024 and has since disbanded.