"It really is saving us a huge number of hours over the days, weeks and months. Having more relevant support at hand, not having to draft or review documents them from scratch - it all adds up."
Southampton FC
Access all documents on Theft
A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it: Theft Act 1968, s 1.Subsequent provisions of the TA 1968 define, or partly define, each of the requirements of the offence.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.
For our full legal glossary and more legal research sources, register for a free Lexis+ trial
Deferred Prosecution Agreements entered into to date—checklist A Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) is a voluntary agreement between an organisation and a designated prosecutor which enables the prosecutor to defer a criminal prosecution by staying an indictment on specific terms agreed with the organisation (see Practice Note: Deferred prosecution agreements). It is therefore a means of alternative disposal for criminal offences. It involves the: • prosecutor inviting the organisation to enter negotiations for a DPA • organisation agreeing to comply with a range of terms and conditions which are monitored • prosecutor agreeing to start but then halt criminal proceedings for the alleged offence • prosecutor applying to the court for approval of the DPA No proceedings in relation to the matters covered by the DPA may be instituted against the organisation while the DPA remains in force and is complied with. Should the organisation breach the terms of the DPA, the prosecutor may apply to the court to restart the original criminal prosecution. DPAs are only available to organisations in...
Sentencing Guidelines for Corporate offenders—Fraud or VAT offences checklist This Checklist summarises the Sentencing Council’s guidelines for sentencing corporate offences of fraud under the Fraud Act 2006 (FrA 2006), Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968), Value Added Tax Act 1994 (VATA 1994) and Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 (CEMA 1979) in the Crown Court and magistrates’ court. The Fraud Guidelines for corporate offenders can be accessed here: • Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guideline—Corporate offenders: fraud, bribery and money laundering—for use in cases involving corporates being sentenced in the magistrates’ court • Crown Court Sentencing Guideline—Corporate offenders: fraud, bribery and money laundering—for use in cases involving corporates being sentenced in the Crown Court The Sentencing Council also publishes a number of overarching guidelines, which should be considered in respect of all sentencing exercises. This includes: • Totality guideline (Crown Court) • Totality guideline (magistrates’ court) • General guideline—overarching principles (Crown Court) • General guideline—overarching principles (magistrates’ court) • Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea (Crown Court) • Reduction in...
Discover our 3 Checklists on Theft
The offence of theft and mode of trialTheft is an either way offence; it can be tried in the magistrates' court or the Crown Court. However, low level shoplifting within the meaning of section 22A of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 (MCA 1980) (where the value of the stolen goods does not exceed £200) is triable only summarily. Where a number of low level shoplifting offences are charged at the same time and the aggregated value of the offences exceeds £200, the offence is not deemed to be low-level within the meaning of MCA 1980, s 22A and can therefore be tried either way.In Candlish the Administrative Court held that 'low value' shop theft allegations should not be treated as summary stand-alone offences, notwithstanding their aggregate value, up to the point of plea and allocation. Citing Harvey, the Administrative Court confirmed in Candlish that the phrase, ‘charged on the same occasion,’ in MCA 1980, s 22A(4)(b), refers to the stage at which the offender first appears before the justices to...
RobberyRobbery is a theft offence under section 8 of the Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968), involving dishonesty but elevated also by the use of, or threat of, force.Robbery can only be tried in the Crown Court on indictment.Elements of the offence of robberyA person is guilty of robbery if:•they steal something, and•immediately before or at the time of doing so, and in order to do so, they:â—¦use force on any person, orâ—¦put any person in fear of being subjected to force then and thereForce, or the threat of force, must be used 'immediately before or at the time' of the theft. There is no guidance as to what 'immediately before' means. If the force used or threatened is after the offence of theft has taken place there will be no robbery, however theft can be a continuing offence. See: R v Hale (1978) 68 Cr App Rep 415, [1979] Crim LR 596 (not reported by ÀÏ˾»úÎçÒ¹¸£Àû®).The use or threat of force must be 'in order' to carry out the theft. Force...
Discover our 27 Practice Notes on Theft
Data breach monitoring record 1 General information Date of monitoring review [insert date] Person conducting monitoring review [insert name and job title] 2 Volume of data breaches identified and reported Review your Data breach register for the past 12 months and complete the information below. Category Over the last 12 months Suspected data security breaches [insert number of suspected data security breaches] Actual data security breaches [insert number of actual data security breaches] [Reports to [insert name of any relevant regulator or trade body]] [[insert number of reports sent to relevant regulator or trade body]] Reports to the ICO (involving actual or suspected data security breaches) [insert number of reports sent to the ICO] Data subjects notified of actual or suspected data security breaches [insert number of data subjects notified of actual or suspected data security breaches] Reports to the police (involving actual or suspected data security breaches) [insert number of reports sent to the police] Insurer notifications (involving actual or suspected data security breaches) [ Professional...
Fraud risk management training materials—post-training assessment questions How to use this test These questions are designed to test your understanding following training on fraud risk management. After you have completed this test, please return it to [insert name]. General Name of person completing test [Insert name] Role [Insert role] Date [Insert date] Multiple choice questions Circle the correct answer. Question Multiple choice answers 1. What is fraud? (a) Soliciting or accepting a bribe(b) A crime that involves deception or theft to gain an advantage(c) Exercising powers of ownership over a person 2. How can a company commit the failure to prevent fraud offence under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023? (a) By not having reasonable measures in place(b) By having reasonable measures in place(c) By not having reasonable measures in place because the risk was very low 3. The only relevant defence to a failure to prevent fraud charge, is that [insert organisation name] had reasonable prevention procedures in place, or that it was not...
Dive into our 39 Precedents related to Theft
What is the relevant rehabilitation period related to a conviction for fraud, theft or handling of stolen goods under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 and has this subsequently been amended by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012? Under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (ROA 1974), convictions may become spent after a specified period of time. Under ROA 1974, the time it takes for a conviction to become spent will generally depend on the sentence (not the offence) imposed. ROA 1974, s 5 sets out the rehabilitation periods and specifies the sentences to which it applies. The rehabilitation periods are set out in ROA 1974, s 5(2)–(5) (as amended). They start as soon as the offender is convicted and runs until the end of the specified period, in most cases, the period set out in the table at ROA 1974, s 5(2)(b), with reference to the sentence imposed. Some of the most relevant current rehabilitation periods that might apply to a...
What guidance have the courts recently given on the sentences to be imposed on offenders found guilty of handling stolen goods? Handling stolen goods This Q&A covers the offence of handling stolen goods and the offence under section 22 of the Theft Act 1968. It also considers the guidance published by the Sentencing Council on handling stolen goods and on reported case law from the Court of Appeal Criminal Division, as cases before the Magistrates’ and Crown Court are not formally reported. There is also additional consideration of offences which may be committed in connection with handling stolen goods, and how these may be treated for sentencing purposes. Following summary conviction, the maximum penalty is six months’ imprisonment or a fine or both. For trial on indictment, the maximum penalty is 14 years’ imprisonment. The sentencing guidelines derive from the Court of Appeal’s decision in R v Webbe with an increasing scale for sophisticated or professional offences. For further information on the offence, see Practice Note:...
See the 2 Q&As about Theft
Law360, London: The victim of a phone-snatching in London has secured a court order compelling four companies offering digital asset exchange services to disclose documents tied to an alleged fraud perpetrated against them after £500,000 (US$667,000) in cryptocurrency was drained from his account.
Corporate Crime analysis: Following the publication of new Ministry of Justice (MOJ) guidance that assists with the creation of impact statements for business (ISB), Nicholas Griffin QC, barrister and Kyan Pucks, junior, both at QEB Hollis Whiteman, outline the benefits of corporate crime practitioners utilising ISBs in the interest of their clients.
Read the latest 5 News articles on Theft
**Trials are provided to all ÀÏ˾»úÎçÒ¹¸£Àû content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these ÀÏ˾»úÎçÒ¹¸£Àû services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
0330 161 1234