Supreme Court disallows investment company’s expenditure on advisory services relating to the sale of a subsidiary because it was capital in nature (Centrica Overseas Holdings v HMRC)

Published on: 17 July 2024

Published by a

Specialist Tax Regulatory Materials

Article summary

The Supreme Court dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal, deciding that the expenditure on advisory services relating to the sale of a subsidiary was capital in nature. As well as outlining a summary of the decision, this News Analysis also contains commentary from Helen McGhee, partner at Joseph Hage Aaronson LLP.

Jurisdiction(s): England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales

News

Guidance

Popular Articles

Corporation Tax

Group relief for carried-forward losses

Group relief for carried-forward lossesThis guidance note examines in detail the relief available to groups for carried-forward losses. The scope excludes the treatment of specialist businesses such as banks, insurance companies and oil and gas companies.From 1 April 2017, companies can surrender

14 Jul 2020 11:50 | Produced by Tolley Read more

Personal Tax

Losses on shares set against income

Losses on shares set against incomeUsually, allowable capital losses can only be set against chargeable gains. If the losses are not fully utilised against gains in the year in which they arise, the excess is carried forward to use against future gains. See the Use of capital losses guidance note

14 Jul 2020 12:12 | Produced by Tolley Read more

Personal Tax

Married couple’s allowance

Married couple’s allowanceThe married couple’s allowance (MCA) is only available if one of the two spouses or civil partners was born before 6 April 1935. This means that one member of the couple must be at least 89 years old on 5 April 2024 to qualify for an allowance in the 2023/24 tax year.There

14 Jul 2020 12:13 | Produced by Tolley Read more

��˾��ҹ��