The legal profession has long been rooted in tradition and intellectual rigour, but those qualities alone no longer guarantee success. The real challenge isn鈥檛 choosing between legal talent and technology, it's integrating both. Legal technology has shifted from a support function to a strategic asset. For barristers, the question is no longer whether to modernise, but how effectively they can do it.
The chambers that fail to adapt are on a sure path to irrelevance. Clients in the legal sector are demanding more, competitors are moving faster and legal talent is volatile. Those who don鈥檛 modernise their service models risk being left behind in a market that鈥檚 no longer waiting for tradition to catch up.
This blog takes a closer look at findings from our latest report: A barrister's guide to innovating the client experience.
There鈥檚 a persistent belief that legal skill and technology exist in tension. That investing in one diminishes the other.
Legal expertise is the heart of what barristers offer: years of expertise, insight and judgment that can鈥檛 be replicated by technology. Yet, relying on people alone limits the full potential of chambers. Barristers have only so much time, and the demands on them grow every year. Without support, even the most skilled can fall behind.
Legal AI platforms like Lexis+ AI free barristers from routine tasks, allowing them to focus where they add the most value. It doesn鈥檛 replace judgment, it enhances it by making information easier to find, drafting precise documents in moments and providing accurate answers to a single legal question.
Expertise alone can鈥檛 scale to meet modern demands and technology without human insight risks losing its purpose. The real advantage comes from combining the unique judgment of barristers with the precision of intelligent tools.
Try Lexis+ AI for free today
Generative AI is reshaping how barristers work, but adoption for the bar remains slow. According to a January 2025 老司机午夜福利 survey, only 10% of barristers say their chambers implement new technology quickly, particularly AI.
This hesitation isn鈥檛 surprising given concerns over ethical use of AI and the challenge of integrating AI into established legal workflows. The risks of misapplication are high, leading to errors alongside ethical and reputational impact. Beyond whether AI can be useful lies the uncertainty of whether it can be trusted with the subtlety and responsibility the Bar requires.
Yet the pressure to change is intensifying. Clients expect faster responses, tighter budgets, and greater transparency. Generative AI reduces time spent on legal research, document drafting, repetitive tasks that have traditionally consumed valuable billable hours. By automating these tasks, barristers can focus on complex legal reasoning and advocacy where human judgment is essential. Those who strike this balance improve efficiency and raise the standard for client services.
Our research found that 28% of barristers said their chambers were too slow at billing and administration. A further 26% reported similar concerns about legal research, and 25% about drafting and reviewing legal documents. Time spent on manual, repetitive tasks limits how much value barristers can deliver.
When a legal draft takes longer to write because the source material is hard to find, or a brief is delayed because documents are passed back and forth in email threads, it might be a sign to consider a new system. These inefficiencies affect how quickly chambers can take on new work, how consistently they meet deadlines, and how confidently they respond to complex matters. The problem lies with the infrastructure. Many systems were built for a slower, more predictable era. Replacing them may seem disruptive but doing nothing is riskier.
In our latest innovation report, industry-leading barristers shared how they are moving beyond outdated systems by making focused, practical changes.
Deka Chambers are using AI to improve the speed and quality of legal research. Stephen Glynn notes that the chambers expanded their online library to include AI-assisted tools, which has 鈥渟ignificantly improved鈥 the service they provide to clients. A targeted upgrade, but one that directly enhances day-to-day legal work.
At Cloisters Chambers, innovation is also about resilience. Robin Allen KC explains that they 鈥渞egularly conduct tests, such as phishing assessments, to ensure staff and members remain vigilant.鈥 As more legal processes move online, security is central to professional credibility.
Others are pushing for change in areas like pricing and efficiency. Sean Brannigan KC argues that 鈥渢he old model of hourly fees is very outdated and can lead to inefficiency.鈥 Reconsidering the role of AI as part of a broader shift toward more responsive, client-focused service.
These are examples of how forward-thinking chambers are already testing, implementing, and improving. Using innovation to build momentum that drives real results.
Too often, technology is brought in without a clear plan for where it fits or how success will be measured. That leads to tools being neglected, or worse, disrupting workflows without adding value. To move beyond experimentation, chambers need to define what impact looks like whether that鈥檚 time saved, faster responses to clients or consistent drafting.
Robin Allen KC suggests that to evaluate the benefits of AI effectively, chambers should focus on 鈥渒ey performance indicators including cost efficiency, accuracy, quality of work, and productivity.鈥 The most natural starting points are areas already under pressure: legal research, billing, document drafting, and pricing. These tasks which are already time-consuming, could benefit from a technological upgrade. Measuring the impact of AI on these metrics will show whether technology is supporting legal expertise.
I want to automate document drafting and summarisation at my chambers
Barristers don鈥檛 need to choose between tradition and technology. The real challenge is whether they can build the capability to do both. The key is to preserve the strengths of the Bar while incorporating new advancements to that support them.
Competitiveness no longer comes from having the best people alone. It means investing in technology to support legal talent to work faster, more consistently, and with fewer barriers.
The chambers that lead will rethink how work gets done, not just who does it.
Read the full report here.
* denotes a required field
0330 161 1234